Subject: Re: New chip in TWGS (sources for oscillators)
Path: lobby!newstf02.news.aol.com!portc04.blue.aol.com!newsfeed.mathworks.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newspump.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: mystix1210@my-deja.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 22:52:21 GMT
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <7rmjj1$8la$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <7ri96j$5nd$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <19990913221530.16328.00004623@ng-fh1.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.66.144.42
X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Sep 14 22:52:21 1999 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x39.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 216.66.144.42
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDmystix1210



In article <19990913221530.16328.00004623@ng-fh1.aol.com>,
  supertimer@aol.com (Supertimer) wrote:
> Ok, I found my old DigiKey catalog.  Here are the
> part numbers:
>
> CTS Clock Oscillators, Half Size
>
> 40Mhz     CTX175-ND     $3.25
> 50Mhz     CTX176-ND     $3.25
> 64Mhz     CTX177-ND     $4.45

Keep in mind that these are DigiKey catalog numbers. If you want the
actual manufacturer part number you'll have to look at another column.
This is only useful if you want to order from another source such as a
local electronics component store.

For those who are wondering, the difference between the CTS and Epson
oscillators appears to be only cosmetic. The CTS ones will look like
your original as it's encased in a metal box, where as the Epson ones
look like 4 legged IC's


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.