Subject: Re: ProSel 8 and 16 Path: lobby!newstf02.news.aol.com!audrey01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail From: ljsilicon@aol.com (LJSILICON) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder05.news.aol.com X-Admin: news@aol.com Date: 6 Mar 1999 04:37:46 GMT Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com References: <19990305223753.17291.00004173@ng08.aol.com> Message-ID: <19990305233746.15313.00004343@ng-fv1.aol.com> Here's an email that I received from Gle regarding Prosel and the "so-called" Y2K problem(?) Subj: Re: Prosel Date: 99-03-05 21:01:47 EST From: bredon@sierratel.com (Glen Bredon) To: LJSILICON@aol.com Yes, I placed ProSel in PD. About Y2K I really know nothing - I've been told there is a problem but I don't know the details and have not seen the problem. I do not remember any of my code that would be affected by Y2K as I never coded dates as two digits. But you never know about such things. As far as I am concerned, anyone can distribute patches for things of this sort. I don't offhand know the latest version number for ProSel - but Charlie Newby would know that. Glen Bredon